All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dogs and wolves: A commentary to Janssens et al. (2021)

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F22%3A43966657" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/22:43966657 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ar.24935" target="_blank" >https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ar.24935</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.24935" target="_blank" >10.1002/ar.24935</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dogs and wolves: A commentary to Janssens et al. (2021)

  • Original language description

    Janssens et al. (2021, doi: 10.1002/ar.24624) recently commented on our article (Galeta et al., 2021, doi: 10.1002/ar.24500) regarding the morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dog and Pleistocene wolf crania. The authors argued that these differences reflect the normal population variation of wolves, that some of the cranial measurements used do not reflect morphological changes during domestication. In this commentary, we briefly address the issue of within and between morpho-population variability. The results based on our canid sample suggest that the magnitude of morphological differences between distinct morpho-populations (i.e., recent northern dogs and wolves) is at least twice as large as that observed within morpho-populations (between two groups of recent northern wolves segregated by cluster analysis). The morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dogs and Pleistocene wolves are relatively large, which may indicate that they did not likely represent a single Late Pleistocene morpho-population. Although the sample size was small, the randomization analysis published in 2021 confirmed that the unbalanced composition of the reference sample did not affect the reliability of the morphological segregation of putative Paleolithic dogs and Pleistocene wolves.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50404 - Anthropology, ethnology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EE2.3.30.0038" target="_blank" >EE2.3.30.0038: New excellence in human resources</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology

  • ISSN

    1932-8486

  • e-ISSN

    1932-8494

  • Volume of the periodical

    305

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    12

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    3422-3429

  • UT code for WoS article

    000787530200001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85128846264