Lecture at a domestic conference: Hume, AI and Cognitive Architectures
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F25%3A43976575" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23330/25:43976575 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Lecture at a domestic conference: Hume, AI and Cognitive Architectures
Original language description
This paper examines the connection between David Hume’s conception of the mind, cognitivescience, and artificial intelligence. It proposes a thesis that Hume’s account of mind and itsfaculties, as presented in A Treatise of Human Nature (Hume, D. 2007), can be coherentlyreinterpreted as a form of cognitive architecture - and further as a viable blueprint forpotential computational implementation in a system of artificial cognition. Within theproposed interpretation, the epistemological and skeptical features of Hume’s thinking aresuppressed, while emphasis is put on cognitive-scientific and cognitive-psychological aspectsof his work.The first part of the paper discusses the notion of cognitive architectures, their typology, andtheir defining features. (Ye, P. & Wang, T. 2018, Kotseruba, I. & Tsotsos, J. 2020, Gudivada,V. 2018). Particular attention is given to two crucial components of cognition - representationsand operations (Schlicht, T., Smortchkova, K. & Dołęga, K. 2020, Thagard, P. 2012,Frankish, K. & Ramsey, W. 2012) and to three key features of artificial cognitive systems asdefined by Fodor and Pylyshyn, i.e. compositionality, systematicity, and productivity (Fodor,J. & Pylyshyn, Z. 1988, Fodor, J. 1983).The second part of the paper examines Hume’s account of the mind, mental faculties, andprinciples of association, while arguing that:(1) Humean perceptions can be understood as a species of a non-linguistic mentalrepresentations.(2) Hume’s distinction between simple perceptions (qua mental atoms) and complexperceptions (qua composite mental entities), together with Hume’s conception of associativeprinciples and imaginative faculty, provides sufficient ground for the ascription ofcompositionality to the Humean conception of the mind.(3) To this conception of mind also, productivity can be attributed in virtue of theimagination’s capacity to create novel perceptions by recombining mental content alreadyavailable to it.(4) Humean associative principles also imply the presence of a weak (or improper) type ofsystematicity.(Cf. Fodor, J. 2003, Buckner, C. 2023).The last section of the paper presents two examples of cognitive architectures inspired by thehistory of philosophy, offering further context and support for the case of Humean conceptionof the mind qua cognitive architecture. The first example is C. Buckner’s DoGMA, anarchitecture based on principles of moderate empiricism that incorporates mental faculties in aform of domain-general cognitive mechanisms (See Buckner, C. 2023). The second is R.Evans’s Aperception engine, derived from Kant’s a priori psychology in the Critique of PureReason (Kant, I. 1998), an architecture that was recently implemented in a real-world systemof artificial cognition (Evans, R. 2022, cf. Schlicht, T. 2022).Taken together, these considerations should support the relevance of the thesis that Hume’sconception of mind can be coherently interpreted as a cognitive architecture with possiblecomputational implementation, especially when similar strategies as those employed byBuckner and Evans would be used. They also highlight the relevance of Hume’s thinking forcontemporary research in cognitive sciences and artificial intelligence, showing how hisaccount of mind aligns with contemporary computational models of cognition.Název akce: UIVID 2025: Umělá inteligence v interdisciplinární diskuMísto konání: PlzeňDatum zahájení: 17.10.2025Datum ukončení: 18.10.2025
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů