All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Issues when the parental and host country systemic institution buffers differ: the case of Czechia

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23510%2F24%3A43969635" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23510/24:43969635 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00213-4" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00213-4</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00213-4" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41261-022-00213-4</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Issues when the parental and host country systemic institution buffers differ: the case of Czechia

  • Original language description

    The article analyses regulatory reforms in the EU to the capital bufers for mitigating risks associated with institutions&apos;systemic importance in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD). The Directive includes a bufer for other relevantinstitutions (O-SIIs) and limits its size to a general cap and a specifc cap for subsidiaries. However, the specifc subsidiarycap may limit national authorities&apos; ability to set a sufcient bufer for domestic institutions that are members of Europeanbanking groups to cover risks to the domestic market. It also may lead to a situation where two institutions of similar systemicimportance could be subject to diferent O SII bufer rates because their owners are of diferent systemic importance and havediferent O-SII bufer rates in diferent EU jurisdictions. The amended CRD V increases the general and subsidiary cap forthe O-SII reserve by one percentage point. However, the cap for subsidiary institutions remained in force, which limits thesetting of capital bufers, especially for banking sectors with signifcant foreign ownership. These include mainly countriesof the former Soviet-aligned Eastern Bloc. This paper outlines shortcomings of the subsidiary cap, argues for a revision ofit to ensure level playing feld in these capital bufers and quantifes the impact of the subsidiary cap according to the CRDIV and CRD V on the capital requirement applied to the Czech banking sector.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50206 - Finance

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Banking Regulation

  • ISSN

    1745-6452

  • e-ISSN

    1750-2071

  • Volume of the periodical

    25

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    49-57

  • UT code for WoS article

    000914334400001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85146304704