All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Do PageRank-based author rankings outperform simple citation counts?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F49777513%3A23520%2F15%3A43925240" target="_blank" >RIV/49777513:23520/15:43925240 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.008" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.008</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.008" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.008</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Do PageRank-based author rankings outperform simple citation counts?

  • Original language description

    The basic indicators of a researcher's productivity and impact are still the number of publications and their citation counts. These metrics are clear, straightforward, and easy to obtain. When a ranking of scholars is needed, for instance in grant, award, or promotion procedures, their use is the fastest and cheapest way of prioritizing some scientists over others. However, due to their nature, there is a danger of oversimplifying scientific achievements. Therefore, many other indicators have been proposed including the usage of the PageRank algorithm known for the ranking of webpages and its modifications suited to citation networks. Nevertheless, this recursive method is computationally expensive and even if it has the advantage of favouring prestige over popularity, its application should be well justified, particularly when compared to the standard citation counts. In this study, we analyze three large datasets of computer science papers in the categories of artificial intelligenc

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    IN - Informatics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Informetrics

  • ISSN

    1751-1577

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    9

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    334-348

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database