Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F21%3A43902507" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12110/21:43902507 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3226/htm" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/6/3226/htm</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063226" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijerph18063226</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice

Original language description

(1) Background: The use of standardized tools is regarded as the basis for an evidence-based assessment. The tools enable monitoring of complex events and the effectiveness of adopted interventions. Some healthcare facilities use standardized tools such as the Morse Fall Scale, but many use non-standardized tools created based on patient needs. Our study question was, why are non-standardized tools used when standardized tools are more beneficial and can be statistically evaluated and compared to other results; (2) Methods: We used a quantitative, non-standardized questionnaire to survey 1200 nurses, which was representative sample for the entire Czech Republic. All questionnaires were assessed in two phases (a) the frequency evaluation and descriptive analysis, and (b) hypotheses testing and correlation analyses; (3) Results: We found that the Conley Scale, Barthel test, and IADL test were preferred by many nurses. Furthermore, we found that nurses using standardized assessment scales noticed risk factors significantly more frequently but regarded the increased complexity of care to be psychologically demanding. (4) Conclusions: In patients with physical disabilities, both types of tools (internal non-standardized and standardized) are used to assess the risk of falls and independence; nurses generally welcomed the increase use of standardized tools in their facilities.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30307 - Nursing

Project

—

Continuities

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year

2021

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

International Journal of Enviromental Research and Public Health

ISSN

1660-4601

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

18

Issue of the periodical within the volume

6

Country of publishing house

CH - SWITZERLAND

Number of pages

11

Pages from-to

3226

UT code for WoS article

000639186600001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85102684231