All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

COMPARISON OF FOUR NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL METHODS OF PAIN RELIEF DURING VENIPUNCTURE IN CHILDREN

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F25%3A43909782" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12110/25:43909782 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://jnss.zsf.jcu.cz/pdfs/jns/2025/01/02.pdf" target="_blank" >https://jnss.zsf.jcu.cz/pdfs/jns/2025/01/02.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    COMPARISON OF FOUR NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL METHODS OF PAIN RELIEF DURING VENIPUNCTURE IN CHILDREN

  • Original language description

    Introduction: Venipuncture is a standard invasive procedure in children that causes pain, leading to procedural anxiety. It emphasises the clinical importance of adequate analgesia and the need to identify effective non-pharmacological procedures.Goal: This study primarily aims to comparatively evaluate the analgesic efficacy of four nonpharmacological interventions: Buzzy® vibrating device, local cooling, felinotherapy, and oral stimulation with a lollipop – compared to standard care (control group) in children aged 4–11 years undergoing venipuncture. The secondary goal was to compare the assessment of pain intensity by the child and the parent.Methods: A prospective five-arm randomised controlled trial included 125 children (25 in each arm). The child and the parent assessed pain intensity immediately after the procedure using the Wong–Baker face scale (WBF 0–5). One-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Tukey’s test (α = 0.05) was used to compare the mean values of the Wong–Baker face scale between groups.Results: The Buzzy® device showed the lowest average pain value according to the children (WBF 1.96 ± 0.90) and was significantly more effective than the lollipop and the control group (p &lt; 0.05). Local cooling (WBF 2.50 ± 1.16) was the second most effective method. The effect of felinotherapy (WBF 2.71 ± 1.16) was not statistically different from the control group (WBF 2.96 ± 1.31). Oral stimulation with a lollipop (WBF 3.79 ± 1.08) was the least effective.According to their perception, parents systematically underestimated children’s pain (average difference in WBF –0.96 points). Neither the age nor the gender of the children influenced the effectiveness of the interventions.Conclusion: Buzzy® vibrating device is the most effective researched non-pharmacological intervention for reducing pain during venipuncture in children aged 4–11 years. Local cooling is also an effective and affordable alternative.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30307 - Nursing

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Nursing, Social Studies, Public Health and Rehabilitation

  • ISSN

    1804-1868

  • e-ISSN

    1804-7181

  • Volume of the periodical

    16

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1-2

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    4-14

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database