What is the reality of wildlife trade volume? CITES Trade Database limitations
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12220%2F18%3A43897957" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12220/18:43897957 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.025" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.025</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.025" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.biocon.2018.05.025</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
What is the reality of wildlife trade volume? CITES Trade Database limitations
Original language description
Five selected forms (claws, skins, skulls, teeth, and trophies) of American black bear (Ursus americanus) were used to demonstrate how variable the volume of total international trade can be based on different approaches. Records from the comparative tabulations of the CITES Trade Database were presented in three ways: (1) identical data from both the exporter and the importer (4%), (2) traded volume reported by the exporter and importer differed (21%), and (3) traded volume reported either by exporter or importer only (75%). Six types of calculations were used to assess the total trade volume of selected American black bear forms. Proportional deviances of alternatively calculated traded volumes from their respective maxima significantly differed between individual calculations. However, these deviances were consistent between forms. The average difference between maximum and minimum calculated traded volume was 63 +/- 23%. The most striking difference was found in trophies, where this difference represented 108,269 trophies in absolute terms. Specific changes to improve the usability of the CITES Trade Database are recommended and include the following: (1) combining the permit number with export and import reports to allow unmistakable identification of the entire trade flow, (2) unambiguous specification of the method of calculating volumes of both gross and net trade tabulations in the database guide, (3) better specification and avoidance of possible confusion of terms (forms), and (4) prohibition of automatically assigning value to empty fields.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10613 - Zoology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Biological Conservation
ISSN
0006-3207
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
224
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Srpen 2018
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
111-116
UT code for WoS article
000439537600012
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85047801187