Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Silage Maize in Relation to Regenerative Agriculture
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12220%2F24%3A43907367" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12220/24:43907367 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/481" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/481</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su16020481" target="_blank" >10.3390/su16020481</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Silage Maize in Relation to Regenerative Agriculture
Original language description
The demand for agricultural products is growing and is resulting in significant environmental impacts due to the overuse of fertilizers (and pesticides in some cases). There is a continued need to find sustainable methods in agricultural systems without harming the environment. Regenerative agriculture can be considered as one of the best methods of sustainable agriculture. The aim of this comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) study was to quantify the environmental impacts associated with the production of silage maize at different doses of fertilizers and pesticides under conventional agriculture and without the use of fertilizers and pesticides under regenerative agriculture. The input data were obtained from the experimental fields and supplemented by background process databases of Ecoinvent, World Food Live Cycle Assessment Database (WFLCD), and the French database AGRIBALYSE. The results of the study were related to six midpoint impact categories: global warming, marine eutrophication, freshwater eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity, and terrestrial ecotoxicity. Although the variant of growing silage maize without the use of fertilizers and pesticides according to the principle of regenerative agriculture showed the lowest burden on the environment, the yields of the cultivated silage maize were 43-55% lower than those of the fertilized variants.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
40106 - Agronomy, plant breeding and plant protection; (Agricultural biotechnology to be 4.4)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
SUSTAINABILITY
ISSN
2071-1050
e-ISSN
2071-1050
Volume of the periodical
16
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
1-15
UT code for WoS article
001151451200001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—