All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Crop Growth Analysis of Autumn- and Spring-Sown Wheat–Pea Intercrops

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12220%2F25%3A43910666" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12220/25:43910666 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/62156489:43310/25:43926745

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/2/477" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/2/477</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15020477" target="_blank" >10.3390/agronomy15020477</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Crop Growth Analysis of Autumn- and Spring-Sown Wheat–Pea Intercrops

  • Original language description

    Intercropping of arable crops might provide yield benefits over monocrops. To assess the effect of sowing date and sowing ratio on biomass formation and competition over time, a two-year field experiment with wheat and pea plants was performed in Eastern Austria with two sowing times (autumn vs. spring) and with the following substitutive wheat–pea sowing ratios (%:%): 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, 12.5:87.5 and 0:100. For both crops, facultative cultivars were used. Compared to spring-sowing, autumn-sowing resulted in earlier development of plants, taller plants, faster soil coverage, a higher crop growth rate up to mid-May in the first year and early June in the second year, more above-ground dry matter production and in the second year also in a higher land equivalent ratio (LER) of intercrops. Sowing ratios affected absolute and relative growth rates of wheat and pea plants. Wheat, which was generally the stronger partner in the intercrops, out-competed pea plants in all intercrops in the first year due to a higher early crop growth rate and in the second year, when the monocrop biomass of wheat was lower than that of pea plants, even in the intercrops with lower wheat and higher pea share. All intercrops resulted in a yield advantage compared to the monocrops as indicated by the LER. At final harvest, this yield advantage was over both sowing times and all four intercropping ratios 14% in the first and 10% in the second year. The competitive abilities of individual crops in mixtures, as indicated by the partial LER, were not affected by the sowing time.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40101 - Agriculture

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Agronomy - Basel

  • ISSN

    2073-4395

  • e-ISSN

    2073-4395

  • Volume of the periodical

    15

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    1-20

  • UT code for WoS article

    001429852100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85218877099