All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Co-occurring graminoid and forb species do not differ in their root morphological response to soil heterogeneity

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F06%3A00006825" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/06:00006825 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Co-occurring graminoid and forb species do not differ in their root morphological response to soil heterogeneity

  • Original language description

    We measured the proliferation of roots into experimental nutrient patches in a grassland community, distinguishing roots of graminoids and forbs. Biomass, length, and specific length were estimated for roots of each of the two functional groups, collected from patches differing in nutrient concentration, and established at four different times during a season. The ratio of graminoid and forb roots was compared with the graminoid-forb ratio in the above-ground biomass. Plant roots proliferated more intensively into patches with higher nutrient concentration, but the roots of the two functional groups had a similar ability to target richer patches. Relative proportion of graminoids was higher below-ground than above-ground and changed during the season,being lowest after mowing. Specific root length was higher for graminoid species, but did not respond to nutrient concentration in patches for either functional group. This is the first study to provide comparative information about root

  • Czech name

    Co-occurring graminoid and forb species do not differ in their root morphological response to soil heterogeneity

  • Czech description

    We measured the proliferation of roots into experimental nutrient patches in a grassland community, distinguishing roots of graminoids and forbs. Biomass, length, and specific length were estimated for roots of each of the two functional groups, collected from patches differing in nutrient concentration, and established at four different times during a season. The ratio of graminoid and forb roots was compared with the graminoid-forb ratio in the above-ground biomass. Plant roots proliferated more intensively into patches with higher nutrient concentration, but the roots of the two functional groups had a similar ability to target richer patches. Relative proportion of graminoids was higher below-ground than above-ground and changed during the season,being lowest after mowing. Specific root length was higher for graminoid species, but did not respond to nutrient concentration in patches for either functional group. This is the first study to provide comparative information about root

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    EF - Botany

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA206%2F02%2F1089" target="_blank" >GA206/02/1089: Exploitation of nutrient patches by grassland plants: foraging and competitive strategies</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2006

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Folia Geobotanica: Journal of Ecology and Systematics

  • ISSN

    1211-9520

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    41

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    121-135

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database