Biological soil crust community types differ in key ecological functions

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F13%3A43885496" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/13:43885496 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0038071713001831/1-s2.0-S0038071713001831-main.pdf?_tid=2e76c8f2-8076-11e3-ba7f-00000aab0f6b&acdnat=1390073262_a34286b20eaffd8d36b3918f6ea4b6e5" target="_blank" >http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0038071713001831/1-s2.0-S0038071713001831-main.pdf?_tid=2e76c8f2-8076-11e3-ba7f-00000aab0f6b&acdnat=1390073262_a34286b20eaffd8d36b3918f6ea4b6e5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.011" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.011</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Biological soil crust community types differ in key ecological functions
Original language description
Soil stability, nitrogen and carbon fixation were assessed for eight biological soil crust community types within a Mojave Desert wilderness site. Cyanolichen crust outperformed all other crusts in multi-functionality whereas incipient crust had the poorest performance. A finely divided classification of biological soil crust communities improves estimation of ecosystem function and strengthens the accuracy of landscape-scale assessments.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
DF - Pedology
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2013
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)