All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Global patterns of interaction specialization in bird-flower networks

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F17%3A43895434" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/17:43895434 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/67985939:_____/17:00478075 RIV/00216208:11310/17:10361609

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.13045/epdf" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.13045/epdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13045" target="_blank" >10.1111/jbi.13045</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Global patterns of interaction specialization in bird-flower networks

  • Original language description

    Aim Among the world&apos;s three major nectar-feeding bird taxa, hummingbirds are the most phenotypically specialized for nectarivory, followed by sunbirds, while the honeyeaters are the least phenotypically specialized taxa. We tested whether this phenotypic specialization gradient is also found in the interaction patterns with their floral resources. We compiled interaction networks between birds and floral resources for 79 hummingbird, nine sunbird and 33 honeyeater communities. Interaction specialization was quantified through connectance (C), complementary specialization (H-2), binary (Q(B)) and weighted modularity (Q), with both observed and null-model corrected values. We compared interaction specialization among the three types of bird-flower communities, both independently and while controlling for potential confounding variables, such as plant species richness, asymmetry, latitude, insularity, topography, sampling methods and intensity. Results Hummingbird-flower networks were more specialized than honeyeater-flower networks. Specifically, hummingbird-flower networks had a lower proportion of realized interactions (lower C), decreased niche overlap (greater H-2) and greater modularity (greater Q(B)). However, we found no significant differences between hummingbird- and sunbird-flower networks, nor between sunbird- and honeyeater-flower networks. Main conclusions As expected, hummingbirds and their floral resources have greater interaction specialization than honeyeaters, possibly because of greater phenotypic specialization and greater floral resource richness in the New World. Interaction specialization in sunbird-flower communities was similar to both hummingbird-flower and honeyeater-flower communities. These results suggest a link between interaction specialization and both phenotypic specialization and floral resource richness within bird-flower communities at a global scale.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10618 - Ecology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GB14-36098G" target="_blank" >GB14-36098G: Center for tropical biology</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Biogeography

  • ISSN

    0305-0270

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    44

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    1891-1910

  • UT code for WoS article

    000406117000020

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database