Stabilization of soil organic matter by earthworms is connected with physical protection rather than with chemical changes of organic matter
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F17%3A43895741" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/17:43895741 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/60077344:_____/17:00474994 RIV/00216208:11310/17:10359864
Result on the web
<a href="https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0016706116308163/1-s2.0-S0016706116308163-main.pdf?_tid=c3fd1326-f918-11e7-a3f5-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1515927222_2eb57f3c216cf8928c58756821fc03e7" target="_blank" >https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0016706116308163/1-s2.0-S0016706116308163-main.pdf?_tid=c3fd1326-f918-11e7-a3f5-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1515927222_2eb57f3c216cf8928c58756821fc03e7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.017" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.017</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Stabilization of soil organic matter by earthworms is connected with physical protection rather than with chemical changes of organic matter
Original language description
Earthworms are important drivers for the formation of soil structure and play a key role in soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics. Our previous long-term (126 weeks) laboratory experiment showed that carbon (C) loss declined through time in soil when litter was mixed and consumed by earthworms (Lumbricus rubellus). Eventually, the C loss was lower than in treatments where litter was mechanically mixed into soil with exclusion of earthworms. However, it is not clear if the solely physical manipulation of soil or biological activity of earthworms lead to different SOM quality, which would result in a distinction in C loss and consequently C sequestration. Thus, we differentiated between physical (mechanical mixing) and earthworm effects on SOM composition. Two types of soil were used in the experiment: clay and sand, and these were incubated with alder (Alnus glutinosa) and willow (Salix caprea) litter, respectively. The combination of soils and litter types corresponds to the natural combinations at the sampling sites. To explain underlying mechanisms of a lower C loss in the earthworm vs. mechanically mixed treatment, we separated SOM fractions in order to gain pools defined in the Rothamsted model. Chemical differences between initial litter and the active and slow pool of SOM obtained by fractionation were studied. No significant differences between the earthworm and mechanically mixed treatment were found in C, nitrogen (N), and phenol contents, composition of major chemical groups of litter studied by solid-state C-13 NMR spectroscopy, and composition of aromatic components of SOM studied by analytical pyrolysis (Py GC/MS). This lack of differences in chemical composition suggests that greater SOM sequestration in the earthworm treatment is likely to be connected with physical protection of SOM inside cast aggregates rather than with chemical changes in SOM mediated by earthworms.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
40104 - Soil science
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GAP504%2F12%2F1288" target="_blank" >GAP504/12/1288: The role of leaf functional traits in soil organic matter accumulation during primary sucession</a><br>
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Geoderma
ISSN
0016-7061
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
289
Issue of the periodical within the volume
MAR 1 2017
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
29-35
UT code for WoS article
000392771300004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—