Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F18%3A43897490" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/18:43897490 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/61388971:_____/18:00494118
Result on the web
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/69/18/4483/5046136" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/jxb/article/69/18/4483/5046136</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery240" target="_blank" >10.1093/jxb/ery240</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
Original language description
Photoprotective non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) represents an effective way to dissipate the light energy absorbed in excess by most phototrophs. It is often claimed that NPQ formation/relaxation kinetics are determined by xanthophyll composition. We, however, found that, for the alveolate alga Chromera velia, this is not the case. In the present paper, we investigated the reasons for the constitutive high rate of quenching displayed by the alga by comparing its light harvesting strategies with those of a model phototroph, the land plant Spinacia oleracea. Experimental results and in silico studies support the idea that fast quenching is due not to xanthophylls, but to intrinsic properties of the Chromera light harvesting complex (CLH) protein, related to amino acid composition and protein folding. The pK(a) for CLH quenching was shifted by 0.5 units to a higher pH compared with higher plant antennas (light harvesting complex II; LHCII). We conclude that, whilst higher plant LHCIIs are better suited for light harvesting, CLHs are 'natural quenchers' ready to switch into a dissipative state. We propose that organisms with antenna proteins intrinsically more sensitive to protons, such as C. velia, carry a relatively high concentration of violaxanthin to improve their light harvesting. In contrast, higher plants need less violaxanthin per chlorophyll because LHCII proteins are more efficient light harvesters and instead require co-factors such as zeaxanthin and PsbS to accelerate and enhance quenching.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10611 - Plant sciences, botany
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Experimental Botany
ISSN
0022-0957
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
69
Issue of the periodical within the volume
18
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
4483-4493
UT code for WoS article
000442309600021
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85055562082