Framing fragmentation in strategic policy documents in spatial planning and environmental domains: differences and similarities
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12310%2F20%3A43902063" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12310/20:43902063 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09640568.2019.1589433" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09640568.2019.1589433</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1589433" target="_blank" >10.1080/09640568.2019.1589433</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Framing fragmentation in strategic policy documents in spatial planning and environmental domains: differences and similarities
Original language description
Fragmentation is a complex issue and the way it is framed will impact on policy decisions. The Czech Republic has adopted several strategic policy documents in spatial planning and environmental domains that address fragmentation. However, these documents differ in how they frame fragmentation. Our goal was to evaluate the differences in 1) framing the problem of fragmentation and 2) suggested solutions. We performed a content analysis of the strategic policy documents by coding text using the key fragmentation aspects - biological organization, land cover, and connectivity. Next, we categorized data either to species-oriented, pattern-oriented, or ecosystem service frames and suggested criteria to evaluate the quality of the framing. This method was useful to show the divergence in the framing of fragmentation as a problem between two policy domains. The results show that the pattern-oriented frame and mitigation solutions are the most prominent aspects, and also fragmentation is not well framed.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
ISSN
0964-0568
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
63
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
18
Pages from-to
415-432
UT code for WoS article
000470643800001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85064922469