Comparison of results of spiroergometry on running and bicycle ergometer of athletes with running and cycling specialization

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12410%2F20%3A43901831" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12410/20:43901831 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://munispace.muni.cz/library/catalog/chapter/1711/216" target="_blank" >https://munispace.muni.cz/library/catalog/chapter/1711/216</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9631-2020-17" target="_blank" >10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9631-2020-17</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Comparison of results of spiroergometry on running and bicycle ergometer of athletes with running and cycling specialization

Original language description

Purpose: A choice between a running or bicycle ergometer is not possible in every laboratory. Significant differences may appear in measuring results of ergometers with different load specificity. The objective of our paper is to determine a difference in values measured during a spiroergometry test on a bicycle ergometer and a running ergometer in adolescent endurance sportsmen, with different specializations, for mountain cyclists and middle-and long-distance runners. Methods: The experiment involved 10 cyclists and 10 runners at the national top level. The cyclists and runners were divided in two groups: one half of the tested group completed the first test on a running ergometer and the other on a bicycle ergometer. The test on the other ergometer was taken after three days&apos; time. The progressed load test up to &quot;vita maxima&quot; was used for both ergometers. The examined parameters included values VO 2 max, V T , VE, BF, HR max and WR max. Results were evaluated in terms of both statistical and substantial significance. Statistical significance was ascertained by means of t-test at the level α=0.05. Cohen&apos;s d was used to evaluate substantial significance. Results: The results showed substantially significant differences for runners in all examined parameters. A substantially significant difference in measurement results of cyclists was discovered for parameters VO2 max, VT , VE and WR max. In runners, the mean of values for the most important parameter VO2 max reached 60.6 ± 4.24 ml.min-1.kg-1 when running, and 56.0 ± 5.34 ml.min-1.kg-1 when cycling; values reached by cyclists were 56.6 ± 5.16 ml.min-1.kg-1 when running, and 61.30 ± 4.47 ml.min-1.kg-1 when cycling. The only parameter not to correspond with the sportsmen&apos;s specializations was V T , as it revealed larger values on a bicycle also for runners. Conclusion: Results confirmed the correspondence between the load specificity according to the ergometer selected and the specificity of sports pursued. It was proven that it is necessary to select a suitable type of appliance for determining VO2 max according to the sports pursued.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

D - Article in proceedings

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30306 - Sport and fitness sciences

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2020

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Article name in the collection

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Kinanthropology, Sport and Quality of Life 7.–9. 11. 2019

ISBN

978-80-210-9631-8

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Number of pages

7

Pages from-to

140-146

Publisher name

Masarykova univerzita v Brně, Fakulta sportovních studií

Place of publication

Brno

Event location

Brno

Event date

Nov 7, 2019

Type of event by nationality

WRD - Celosvětová akce

UT code for WoS article

000618047200017