All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

On the Differences between DEA and Selected MCDM Methods

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12510%2F17%3A43897055" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12510/17:43897055 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    On the Differences between DEA and Selected MCDM Methods

  • Original language description

    In many economic applications, it is necessary to compare some units, to choose the best one or to identify good ones. Many ways how to handle this problem exist. In this paper, we are interested in DEA and MCDM methods. Data envelopment analysis methods (DEA) are focused on productive efficiency of decision making units with respect to the values of their inputs and outputs. The aim of the DEA model is to identify a set of efficient and inefficient units. Multiple-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) typically search for the ?best? alternative from a set of avaible alternatives or for a small group of ?optimal?alternatives. However, in these problems the solution depends on decision-maker?s preferences. It is known inputs of DEA are in fact costs criteria and outputs are profits criteria. Hence, it seems the aims of these methods are very similar. The aim of this paper is to discuss if it is possible to compare results of DEA and MCDM methods.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10102 - Applied mathematics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific Conference INPROFORUM 2017. Innovations, Enterprises, Regions and Management

  • ISBN

    978-80-7394-667-8

  • ISSN

    2336-6788

  • e-ISSN

    2336-6788

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    338-343

  • Publisher name

    Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Ekonomická fakulta

  • Place of publication

    České Budějovice

  • Event location

    České Budějovice

  • Event date

    Nov 9, 2017

  • Type of event by nationality

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • UT code for WoS article