All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Community Landscape Preferences for Reuse of Soviet-Era Post-Agricultural Brownfields—What’s the Difference?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12510%2F23%3A43906788" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12510/23:43906788 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ruso.12479" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ruso.12479</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12479" target="_blank" >10.1111/ruso.12479</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Community Landscape Preferences for Reuse of Soviet-Era Post-Agricultural Brownfields—What’s the Difference?

  • Original language description

    Reuse preferences for post-agricultural brownfields on former socialist agricultural premises in CEE countries are likely to be diverse and may depend on communities&apos; experiences. Our research question is to reveal, through a questionnaire survey of 774 respondents from 180 communities, the difference in reuse preferences among communities with different experiences: communities where former collective farm sites had been abandoned (leaving a post-agricultural brownfield), those where such sites had remained in continuous agricultural use, and those where such sites had been abandoned and later remediated or reused. The responses from the three types of communities were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests and the structure of preferences was analyzed by Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling. Communities with an existing post-agricultural brownfield prefer housing and leisure activities, while communities with sites in continuous agricultural production prefer agrarian uses. Two main poles of choice were identified—productive and non-productive uses. While productive uses are preferred by respondents from communities with continuous agricultural production, non-productive uses are preferred by communities with former post-agricultural brownfields. The presence of post-agricultural brownfields within the community is an important factor in determining a community&apos;s preferences for its reuse. When agricultural sites are abandoned, communities&apos; preferences for its reuse also change. © 2023 Rural Sociological Society (RSS).

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50403 - Social topics (Women´s and gender studies; Social issues; Family studies; Social work)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Rural Sociology

  • ISSN

    1549-0831

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    88

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    30

  • Pages from-to

    "362 "- 391

  • UT code for WoS article

    000928820700001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85147530561