Community Landscape Preferences for Reuse of Soviet-Era Post-Agricultural Brownfields—What’s the Difference?

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12510%2F23%3A43906788" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12510/23:43906788 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ruso.12479" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ruso.12479</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12479" target="_blank" >10.1111/ruso.12479</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Community Landscape Preferences for Reuse of Soviet-Era Post-Agricultural Brownfields—What’s the Difference?

Original language description

Reuse preferences for post-agricultural brownfields on former socialist agricultural premises in CEE countries are likely to be diverse and may depend on communities&apos; experiences. Our research question is to reveal, through a questionnaire survey of 774 respondents from 180 communities, the difference in reuse preferences among communities with different experiences: communities where former collective farm sites had been abandoned (leaving a post-agricultural brownfield), those where such sites had remained in continuous agricultural use, and those where such sites had been abandoned and later remediated or reused. The responses from the three types of communities were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests and the structure of preferences was analyzed by Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling. Communities with an existing post-agricultural brownfield prefer housing and leisure activities, while communities with sites in continuous agricultural production prefer agrarian uses. Two main poles of choice were identified—productive and non-productive uses. While productive uses are preferred by respondents from communities with continuous agricultural production, non-productive uses are preferred by communities with former post-agricultural brownfields. The presence of post-agricultural brownfields within the community is an important factor in determining a community&apos;s preferences for its reuse. When agricultural sites are abandoned, communities&apos; preferences for its reuse also change. © 2023 Rural Sociological Society (RSS).

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50403 - Social topics (Women´s and gender studies; Social issues; Family studies; Social work)

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2023

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Rural Sociology

ISSN

1549-0831

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

88

Issue of the periodical within the volume

2

Country of publishing house

US - UNITED STATES

Number of pages

30

Pages from-to

"362 "- 391

UT code for WoS article

000928820700001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85147530561