All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

What's in the water? - Target and suspect screening of contaminants of emerging concern in raw water and drinking water from Europe and Asia

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12520%2F21%3A43904057" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12520/21:43904057 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117099" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117099</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117099" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.watres.2021.117099</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    What's in the water? - Target and suspect screening of contaminants of emerging concern in raw water and drinking water from Europe and Asia

  • Original language description

    There is growing worry that drinking water can be affected by contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), potentially threatening human health. In this study, a wide range of CECs ( n = 177), including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and other compounds, were analysed in raw water and in drinking water collected from drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) in Europe and Asia ( n = 13). The impact of human activities was reflected in large numbers of compounds detected ( n = 115) and high variation in concentrations in the raw water (range 15-7995 ng L -1 for E177 CECs). The variation was less pronounced in drinking water, with total concentration ranging from 35 to 919 ng L -1 . Treatment efficiency was on average 65 +/- 28%, with wide variation between different DWTPs. The DWTP with the highest ECEC concentrations in raw water had the most efficient treatment procedure (average treatment efficiency 89%), whereas the DWTP with the lowest E177 CEC concentration in the raw water had the lowest average treatment efficiency (2.3%). Suspect screening was performed for 500 compounds ranked high as chemicals of concern for drinking water, using a prioritisation tool (SusTool). Overall, 208 features of interest were discovered and three were confirmed with reference standards. There was co-variation between removal efficiency in DWTPs for the target compounds and the suspected features detected using suspect screening, implying that removal of known contaminants can be used to predict overall removal of potential CECs for drinking water production. Our results can be of high value for DWTPs around the globe in their planning for future treatment strategies to meet the increasing concern about human ex-posure to unknown CECs present in their drinking water. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Water Research

  • ISSN

    0043-1354

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    198

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    neuveden

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    56

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    000651349000001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85105896436