All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparative ultrastructure of the antennae and sensory hairs in six species of crayfish

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60076658%3A12520%2F23%3A43906246" target="_blank" >RIV/60076658:12520/23:43906246 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15006" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15006</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15006" target="_blank" >10.7717/peerj.15006</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparative ultrastructure of the antennae and sensory hairs in six species of crayfish

  • Original language description

    Background: Antennae in crayfish are essential for gaining information about the local topography and localising food, chemicals, conspecifics or predator. There are still gaps in the research on the morphology of antennae in decapods compared to other arthropods.Methodology: Biometrical and ultrastructural methods were applied using light and cryo-scanning electron microscopies to study the morphology of antennae in six different crayfish species, including marbled crayfish Procambarus virginalis, Mexican dwarf crayfish Cambarellus patzcuarensis, red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii, signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus, common yabby Cherax destructor, and spiny-cheek crayfish Faxonius limosus to find their potential morphological differences.Results: Significant differences in the antenna length, length and width of each segment to carapace length ratios, and the number of segments were found in the six crayfish species. The ultrastructure revealed differences in the distribution of sensory hairs on the antenna and the morphology of the antennal surface.Conclusions: The different morphology of antennae might reflect adaptation to the conditions of their specific habitats. In addition, results showed that a combination of differences in the morphological features and biometrical measurements of antennae could be used for the distinguishment of different studied crayfish species.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10613 - Zoology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    PeerJ

  • ISSN

    2167-8359

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    11

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    neuvedeno

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    000954008300002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85151040769