Response to comment on “Plant diversity incrases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale” (doi:10.1126/science.aar5245)

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F18%3A00507152" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/18:00507152 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/science.aar5245" target="_blank" >https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/science.aar5245</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Response to comment on “Plant diversity incrases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale” (doi:10.1126/science.aar5245)
Original language description
Chisholm and Fung claim that our method of estimating conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD) in recruitment is systematically biased, and present an alternative method that shows no latitudinal pattern in CNDD. We demonstrate that their approach produces strongly biased estimates of CNDD, explaining why they do not detect a latitudinal pattern. We also address their methodological concerns using an alternative distance-weighted approach, which supports our original findings of a latitudinal gradient in CNDD and a latitudinal shift in the relationship between CNDD and species abundance.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)