All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Biodiversity loss caused by subsurface pipe drainage is difficult to restore

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F21%3A00544976" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/21:00544976 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/67985939:_____/21:00544976 RIV/00216208:11310/21:10430460

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857421001919?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857421001919?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106336" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106336</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Biodiversity loss caused by subsurface pipe drainage is difficult to restore

  • Original language description

    Subsurface pipe drainage was a frequently used way of agriculture intensification. Here, we present a case study of peat meadows that were drained from the mid 1980s to 1990s and were restored by interrupting drainage pipes through clay sealed trenches. This trial was subject of extensive survey of plant, soil fauna and soil chemistry, which was done just before restoration and then repeated 20 years later. The water table was the closest to surface in undrained meadows and much deeper in drained and restored meadows during both times. In the restored meadow, some increase of the water table was observed, but the water table was mostly within 60 cm of the surface. Undrained meadow was much richer in soil organic carbon. Plant communities in both drained and restored plots become closer to those in undrained remnants 20 years after restoration. Community weighted mean for Ellenberger values showed that undrained peat meadow remnants were more oligotrophic than drained and restored sites. Soil fauna communities of undrained remnants and both drained treatments were clearly separated in 1990s and lumped together 20 years later. This was caused by a shift in the communities in both drained treatments but also by degradation of undrained remnants, which shifted towards drained sites. The results show that restoration slightly shifted the communities towards the undrained reference sites, but the shift was not much bigger that those in drained sites and in both cases, do not result in peat formation. Control sites also show some degradation most likely due to eutrophication.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40104 - Soil science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Ecological Engineering

  • ISSN

    0925-8574

  • e-ISSN

    1872-6992

  • Volume of the periodical

    170

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    November

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    106336

  • UT code for WoS article

    000685533300015

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85110109975