European fish-based assessment reveals high diversity of systems for determining ecological status of lakes.
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F22%3A00551524" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/22:00551524 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149620" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149620</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149620" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149620</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
European fish-based assessment reveals high diversity of systems for determining ecological status of lakes.
Original language description
Triggered by the adoption of the Water Framework Directive, a variety of fish-based systems were developed throughout Europe to assess the ecological status of lakes. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all existing systems and summarizes sampling methods, fish community traits (metrics) and the relevant anthropogenic pressures assessed by them. Twenty-one European countries developed fish-based assessment systems. Three countries each developed two distinct systems to approach different ecoregions, either to use different data, or to assess different lake types leading to a total number of 24 systems. The most common approach for the setting of reference conditions, used in seventeen systems, was the utilisation of fish communities in comparably undisturbed natural lakes as reference. Eleven used expert judgment, nine historical data and eight modelled relationships. Fourteen systems combined at least two approaches. The most common fish sampling method was a standardized fishing procedure with multimesh-gillnets. Many countries applied combinations of fishing methods, e.g. non-standard gillnets, fyke nets and electrofishing. Altogether 177 metrics were used for index development and each system combined 2-13 metrics. The most common ones were total standardized catches of number and biomass, relative abundance of Perca fluviatilis,
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10618 - Ecology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF16_025%2F0007417" target="_blank" >EF16_025/0007417: Biomanipulation as a tool for improving water quality of dam reservoirs</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Science of the Total Environment
ISSN
0048-9697
e-ISSN
1879-1026
Volume of the periodical
802
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Jan
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
149620
UT code for WoS article
000701752500003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85113207536