All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Estimating predation pressure in ecological studies: controlling bias imposed by using sentinel plasticine prey

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F23%3A00564168" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/23:00564168 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/60076658:12310/23:43906446

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eea.13249" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eea.13249</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eea.13249" target="_blank" >10.1111/eea.13249</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Estimating predation pressure in ecological studies: controlling bias imposed by using sentinel plasticine prey

  • Original language description

    Sentinel plasticine prey has been increasingly used to estimate predation pressure. The use of plasticine prey may, however, bias the results, as this method was originally designed to account for predation by organisms that can visually recognize the shapes and colors of their prey. To evaluate the limitations of using sentinel plasticine prey, we compared predator attack rates between real prey dead and live mealworms, Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and plasticine models in a monsoonal tropical rainforest of southeastern China. The attack rates by invertebrates were highest on dead prey followed by live prey and plasticine models, whereas the attack rates by vertebrates were lowest on dead prey, and did not differ between live prey and plasticine models. These results confirm that bias imposed by using the plasticine models is affected by the type of predators. In addition, we tested the validity and generality of the premise that predators can distinguish the shapes of plasticine model prey and preferentially attack a caterpillar-like shape over other shapes. To test this hypothesis, we conducted three independent experiments in China, Papua New Guinea, and Finland. In the two latter localities, predation rates on plasticine caterpillars were higher than on models of other shapes, whereas in China, these differences were not significant. Taken together, our study suggests that plasticine models may underestimate the predation by invertebrates to a greater extent than predation by vertebrates, and the preference of model shape by predators may be locality-specific, presumably due to differences in the composition of the predator community. We propose that predation be estimated on both live and plasticine prey in future studies to measure the potential bias imposed by using plasticine models and its variation among various habitats and predator groups.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10618 - Ecology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

  • ISSN

    0013-8703

  • e-ISSN

    1570-7458

  • Volume of the periodical

    171

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    56-67

  • UT code for WoS article

    000876540000001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85141411141