All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Detailed insight into gillnet catches: Fish directivity and micro distribution

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F24%3A00605726" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/24:00605726 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182683" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182683</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w16182683" target="_blank" >10.3390/w16182683</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Detailed insight into gillnet catches: Fish directivity and micro distribution

  • Original language description

    Gillnets are widely used in research and commercial fishery activities. As passive gear, gillnets can be selective and dependent on the diel migration of fish. In areas with limited littoral extent, inshore-offshore migration may cause bias in the gillnet catch. Our hypothesis was that some factors, such as gillnet saturation, fish depletion, or chemical cues, could be the cause of the bias. We used a total of 66 CEN gillnets deployed at Rimov Reservoir parallel to the shore at different positions of littoral-pelagic gradient. Individual fish direction was recorded from inshore, offshore, or unknown direction (i.e., entangled fish). A total of 5791 fishes from nine different species were caught. For most fish, it was possible to determine their directivity, and most fish were captured in littoral or first pelagic gillnets. Shallower and deeper benthic gillnets differed in their bleak (Alburnus alburnus) catch. No significant differences were found between fish directions. At the species level, only asp (Leuciscus aspius) and ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua) showed differences between the captured directions in one case. The results support the assumption that gillnet capture is a random process that to a great extent is connected to random local movements. This is good news for fish monitoring projects. Sampling catch is likely to reflect true changes in the fish community, and not the effects of the deployment of the sampling gear. The experiment also showed that fish directivity statistics can be used for investigation of fish behavior and gear performance.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10617 - Marine biology, freshwater biology, limnology

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Water

  • ISSN

    2073-4441

  • e-ISSN

    2073-4441

  • Volume of the periodical

    16

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    18

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    2683

  • UT code for WoS article

    001323031100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85205126876