Plant and fauna biodiversity benefits from the combination of reclaimed and unreclaimed sites in heaps after uranium mining
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F25%3A00636175" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/25:00636175 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/60460709:41330/25:102152 RIV/44555601:13520/25:43899666 RIV/00216208:11310/25:10500187
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001016?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001016?via%3Dihub</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107613" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107613</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Plant and fauna biodiversity benefits from the combination of reclaimed and unreclaimed sites in heaps after uranium mining
Original language description
Mining significantly impacts the environment, but post-mining sites, particularly those left to natural succession, often support numerous rare species. Plant and soil fauna communities were studied using field inventories and pitfall trapping on reclaimed and unreclaimed heaps after uranium mining near Příbram (Czech Republic), and in the surrounding landscape (control site). All macrofauna invertebrates were sorted into orders, while Oniscidea, Diplopoda, Chilopoda, Araneae, Carabidae, and Formicidae were identified to the species level. Unreclaimed heaps were covered with stones, sparse shrubby and herbaceous vegetation, while reclaimed heaps were covered by 0.5 m of topsoil and planted with mixed forest. The control site consisted of forest and agricultural land. The number of plant layer species and vegetation cover at this level on unreclaimed heaps were lower compared to reclaimed ones. However, the average number of tree species was higher on unreclaimed sites, despite the average cover of tree layer was lower. A total of 24,101 individuals were caught, with 15,507 identified into 209 species. The highest number of red- listed species was found in reclaimed sites (Kusumoarto et al., 2020 (21)), followed by unreclaimed sites (Heneberg and Rezac, 2018 (14)) and the control site (Chase and Leibold, 2002 (6)). Spiders dominated the red- listed species (Luff, 1998 (24)) across all locations. Habitat preferences differed across all identified invertebrates. Reclaimed sites represent an intermediate state between unreclaimed heaps and the control site. Reclaimed and unreclaimed sites were significantly different from each other, as well as from the control site. Our study indicates that both reclaimed and unreclaimed heaps serve as important biodiversity hotspots for threatened or endangered species.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10618 - Ecology
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Ecological Engineering
ISSN
0925-8574
e-ISSN
1872-6992
Volume of the periodical
215
Issue of the periodical within the volume
May
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
107613
UT code for WoS article
001450527300001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105000143872