All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Soil biodiversity and ecosystem functions in grasslands: Is more always better?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F25%3A00639848" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/25:00639848 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/60076658:12310/25:43910601

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725002822?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725002822?via%3Dihub</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109988" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109988</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Soil biodiversity and ecosystem functions in grasslands: Is more always better?

  • Original language description

    Given the biodiversity crisis, research on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) has grown rapidly. While a positive BEF relationship is often reported, whether it holds across different soils with distinct soil and plant communities remains understudied. Here, we conducted a greenhouse experiment containing five experimental grassland systems representing different (semi)natural grasslands. Each grassland system contained four biodiversity levels established by sequential filtering of the field soil community by size, creating a gradient in their presence, richness and thus community completeness. We found that shoot biomass remained unaffected by treatments. However, consistent with expectations of a positive BEF relationship, nitrification potential and microbial nitrogen content generally increased with biodiversity increase, whereas the relative abundance of predatory/parasitic bacteria decreased. On the contrary, high soil biodiversity led to a decrease in plant nitrogen content and soil urea degradation potential, suggesting that soil biodiversity may influence competition for nitrogen between plants and microbes. Moreover, while microbial biomass carbon was promoted by soil biodiversity in relatively fertile grassland soils and root biomass was unaffected, they were both reduced in poorer soils. These findings highlight that soil biodiversity may promote certain grassland functions but suppress others and that the direction of these trade-offs may depend on the soil characteristics or the biotic community it harbours. The conservation and management of soil biodiversity thus need to be evaluated in the context of the functions that are to be maximised and the grassland soil context.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10618 - Ecology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

  • ISSN

    0038-0717

  • e-ISSN

    1879-3428

  • Volume of the periodical

    211

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    DEC 01

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    109988

  • UT code for WoS article

    001585969300002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105017007297