Soil biodiversity and ecosystem functions in grasslands: Is more always better?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F25%3A00639848" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/25:00639848 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/60076658:12310/25:43910601
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725002822?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725002822?via%3Dihub</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109988" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109988</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Soil biodiversity and ecosystem functions in grasslands: Is more always better?
Original language description
Given the biodiversity crisis, research on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) has grown rapidly. While a positive BEF relationship is often reported, whether it holds across different soils with distinct soil and plant communities remains understudied. Here, we conducted a greenhouse experiment containing five experimental grassland systems representing different (semi)natural grasslands. Each grassland system contained four biodiversity levels established by sequential filtering of the field soil community by size, creating a gradient in their presence, richness and thus community completeness. We found that shoot biomass remained unaffected by treatments. However, consistent with expectations of a positive BEF relationship, nitrification potential and microbial nitrogen content generally increased with biodiversity increase, whereas the relative abundance of predatory/parasitic bacteria decreased. On the contrary, high soil biodiversity led to a decrease in plant nitrogen content and soil urea degradation potential, suggesting that soil biodiversity may influence competition for nitrogen between plants and microbes. Moreover, while microbial biomass carbon was promoted by soil biodiversity in relatively fertile grassland soils and root biomass was unaffected, they were both reduced in poorer soils. These findings highlight that soil biodiversity may promote certain grassland functions but suppress others and that the direction of these trade-offs may depend on the soil characteristics or the biotic community it harbours. The conservation and management of soil biodiversity thus need to be evaluated in the context of the functions that are to be maximised and the grassland soil context.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10618 - Ecology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
ISSN
0038-0717
e-ISSN
1879-3428
Volume of the periodical
211
Issue of the periodical within the volume
DEC 01
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
109988
UT code for WoS article
001585969300002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105017007297