All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comprehensive Assessment of Distance Learning Modules by Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60162694%3AG43__%2F21%3A00556725" target="_blank" >RIV/60162694:G43__/21:00556725 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/409" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/409</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math9040409" target="_blank" >10.3390/math9040409</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comprehensive Assessment of Distance Learning Modules by Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method

  • Original language description

    This survey is focussed on distance learning studies, where there can be met a lot of technical obstacles, which creates complications in decision making. To get an ideal solution for these kinds of problems, the Fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarities to Ideal Solution) is one of the best solutions. Therefore, this paper presents the distance learning quality assessment surveys when the Fuzzy AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS methods are used. Research results describe the application of the Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS hybrid method. MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) programs with MATLAB (R2020b) mathematical package were written to calculate the evaluation results for three distance learning courses. In the practical implementation of the proposed distance learning module evaluation methodology, the experts' evaluation method was applied. Thirty-four judges were chosen with specific knowledge and skills and with very different competencies to assess three alternatives by fourteen criteria. Following the experts' evaluation, a statistical analysis method was used to process the data. After applying the complex evaluation, the comparative analysis method was used to summarize the obtained results. This work further provides useful guidelines for the development of an easily understandable hierarchy of criteria model that reflects the main goal of study quality assessment.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10101 - Pure mathematics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    MATHEMATICS

  • ISSN

    2227-7390

  • e-ISSN

    2227-7390

  • Volume of the periodical

    9

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    25

  • Pages from-to

    409

  • UT code for WoS article

    000624190200001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85101866839