ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF RECREATION - COMPARISON OFTHE TRAVEL COST MODEL (TCM) ANDTHE CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD(CVM)
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F13%3A61555" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/13:61555 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
čeština
Original language name
ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF RECREATION - COMPARISON OFTHE TRAVEL COST MODEL (TCM) ANDTHE CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD(CVM)
Original language description
Tourism that takes place in nature sites benefits from the fact that nature is considered to be a public good. There is no fee charged for being in nature and using nature for recreational purposes. Prevailing nature-based tourism destinations are admission free. To evaluate the economic value of recreation, various methods for valuation of environmental goods are commonly used. The most widely used methods are the travel cost method and contingent valuation method. This paper focuses on comparison of these two methods. It discusses tourists? travel costs to get to a nature-based destination. It studies direct costs to get to a destination place and related indirect costs, including the time costs. To measure the economic value by using the contingentvaluation approach, the Willingness-to-pay method is used. The Willingness-to-pay method measures the consumer surplus tourists have from their recreation (indirect economic value). The direct economic value is measured by expenditures in
Czech name
ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF RECREATION - COMPARISON OFTHE TRAVEL COST MODEL (TCM) ANDTHE CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD(CVM)
Czech description
Tourism that takes place in nature sites benefits from the fact that nature is considered to be a public good. There is no fee charged for being in nature and using nature for recreational purposes. Prevailing nature-based tourism destinations are admission free. To evaluate the economic value of recreation, various methods for valuation of environmental goods are commonly used. The most widely used methods are the travel cost method and contingent valuation method. This paper focuses on comparison of these two methods. It discusses tourists? travel costs to get to a nature-based destination. It studies direct costs to get to a destination place and related indirect costs, including the time costs. To measure the economic value by using the contingentvaluation approach, the Willingness-to-pay method is used. The Willingness-to-pay method measures the consumer surplus tourists have from their recreation (indirect economic value). The direct economic value is measured by expenditures in
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AH - Economics
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2013
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D. Faculty of Economics and Administration
ISSN
1211-555X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
27
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
5-13
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—