Differences in the financial management of conventional, organic, and biodynamic farms

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F15%3A68043" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/15:68043 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0024" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0024</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0024" target="_blank" >10.1515/sab-2015-0024</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Differences in the financial management of conventional, organic, and biodynamic farms
Original language description
The financial management of conventional, organic, and biodynamic farms was evaluated and compared. It is a highly specific issue filling in the gap namely in the area of economic research of biodynamic agriculture. Biodynamic agriculture is a less widespread concept of agriculture, the management of which meets the requirements of organic agriculture. Organic agriculture has still been gaining in importance in the Czech Republic, the number of organic farms has been growing, and availability of organicproducts has increased, too. Of the Czech farms receiving subsidies from the EU or state subsidies in 2007?2012, a total of 389 were selected for analysis (273 of which were conventional farms, 112 organic farms, and 4 farms were engaged in biodynamic agriculture). Subsidies, Total Costs, Operating Revenue, Profit and Gross Value Added indicators were selected for evaluation. The individual indicators within groups of companies were compared by means of a t-test. The analysis revealed s
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
GA - Agricultural economics
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)