All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Likert scale versus Q-table measures – a comparison of host community perceptions of a film festival

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F16%3AN0000016" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/16:N0000016 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15022250.2015.1114901" target="_blank" >http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15022250.2015.1114901</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2015.1114901" target="_blank" >10.1080/15022250.2015.1114901</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Likert scale versus Q-table measures – a comparison of host community perceptions of a film festival

  • Original language description

    Current literature on impact assessment stresses the need to focus on understanding respondents and suggests Q methodology as a suitable instrument. This paper aims to compare Q methodology and the commonly used Likert scaling, to evaluate the impact of residents perception at a film festival. A set of 23 impacts were offered to respondents and the same respondents were interviewed twice over the course of one month, first using Likert scaling, and second using Q table. Finally, a factor analysis was conducted. The factor analysis revealed five factors for both survey techniques. However, the reliability analysis using Cronbach s alpha showed weaker internal consistency for all factors using Q-table. The research results also showed that Likert scaling provided better statistical relevance and easier interpretation of results. Likert scaling also proved that respondents tended to indicate items as strongly agree or agree, so lower impact variability is shown.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AH - Economics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism

  • ISSN

    1502-2250

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    16

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    NO - NORWAY

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    196-207

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database