DSS Capabilities Evaluation Using ANP with Methods for Consistency Improvement

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F22%3A93035" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/22:93035 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://mme2022.vspj.cz/proceedings" target="_blank" >https://mme2022.vspj.cz/proceedings</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Result language

čeština

Original language name

DSS Capabilities Evaluation Using ANP with Methods for Consistency Improvement

Original language description

This paper focuses on decision makers preferences for Decision Support Systems. A survey questionnaire and ANP method was used for Decision support systems (DSS) capabilities evaluation. Knowledge of DSS capabilities preferences is essential for organizations using, implementing or planning to implement DSS. ANP method is based on the pairwise comparison (Saaty method). Unfortunately, human judgement is often inconsistent and finding methods to improve inconsistency while keeping the unprecise comparisons representing the preferences of human decisions are essential. Traditionally, the Saaty method identifies inconsistency and suggests the deduction unless revision can be made with a decision maker which leads to changing his or her original opinion. Here, three methods for improving consistency were tested. The minimum deviation method, which highly preserves the original decision maker preferences while achieving the required consistency was selected for inconsistent pairwise comparisons modi

Czech name

DSS Capabilities Evaluation Using ANP with Methods for Consistency Improvement

Czech description

This paper focuses on decision makers preferences for Decision Support Systems. A survey questionnaire and ANP method was used for Decision support systems (DSS) capabilities evaluation. Knowledge of DSS capabilities preferences is essential for organizations using, implementing or planning to implement DSS. ANP method is based on the pairwise comparison (Saaty method). Unfortunately, human judgement is often inconsistent and finding methods to improve inconsistency while keeping the unprecise comparisons representing the preferences of human decisions are essential. Traditionally, the Saaty method identifies inconsistency and suggests the deduction unless revision can be made with a decision maker which leads to changing his or her original opinion. Here, three methods for improving consistency were tested. The minimum deviation method, which highly preserves the original decision maker preferences while achieving the required consistency was selected for inconsistent pairwise comparisons modi

Type

D - Article in proceedings

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50803 - Information science (social aspects)

Project

—

Continuities

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Publication year

2022

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Article name in the collection

40th International Conference Mathematical Methods in Economics 2022 Proceedings

ISBN

978-80-88064-62-6

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Number of pages

6

Pages from-to

21-26

Publisher name

College of Polytechnics Jihlava

Place of publication

Jihlava

Event location

Jihlava

Event date

Sep 7, 2022

Type of event by nationality

WRD - Celosvětová akce

UT code for WoS article

—