A comparative applied analysis of six robotic-assisted weeding systems in sugar beets
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41210%2F25%3A102583" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41210/25:102583 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/pdfs/pse/2025/11/03.pdf" target="_blank" >https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/pdfs/pse/2025/11/03.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/335/2025-PSE" target="_blank" >10.17221/335/2025-PSE</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A comparative applied analysis of six robotic-assisted weeding systems in sugar beets
Original language description
Effective weed management is crucial in the critical period of sugar beet production, but often lacks sustainability and environmental protection. Recent advancements in sensor-based weed control systems have rendered the latter a realistic prospect, which demands detailed analyses, especially under suboptimal field conditions. The present study analysed six robotic-assisted weed control systems (RAWS) in three experiments on sugar beets in 2024, conducted under dry soil and high weed pressure. The experiments included sensor-based inter-row and intra-row hoeing, spot- and band-spraying and were compared to a broadcast herbicide treatment and an untreated control. Weed control efficacy (WCE) in the intra- and inter-row areas, as well as weed species composition and crop plant damage, were assessed after treatment. The data show that intra-row WCE of two hoeing robots (Farming GT® and Robovator®) equipped with selective intra-row blades achieved up to 80%, which was higher than the broadcast herbicide control with 67% WCE. In the inter-row area, Farming GT® robotic hoeing and ARA® spot-spraying resulted in more than 90% WCE, which was equal to the broadcast herbicide application. Weed species composition was not affected by the different RAWS. Crop plants were affected by all hoeing treatments with maximum non-lethal burial rates of 33%. The highest lethal uprooting of crop plants occurred after Farming GT® robotic hoeing, at 5.5% overall. The results demonstrate the great potential of robotic weeding to replace broadcast herbicide applications.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
40106 - Agronomy, plant breeding and plant protection; (Agricultural biotechnology to be 4.4)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Plant, Soil and Environment
ISSN
1214-1178
e-ISSN
1805-9368
Volume of the periodical
71
Issue of the periodical within the volume
11
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
782-792
UT code for WoS article
001627300300001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105024417972