All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

A comparative applied analysis of six robotic-assisted weeding systems in sugar beets

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41210%2F25%3A102583" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41210/25:102583 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/pdfs/pse/2025/11/03.pdf" target="_blank" >https://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/pdfs/pse/2025/11/03.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/335/2025-PSE" target="_blank" >10.17221/335/2025-PSE</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    A comparative applied analysis of six robotic-assisted weeding systems in sugar beets

  • Original language description

    Effective weed management is crucial in the critical period of sugar beet production, but often lacks sustainability and environmental protection. Recent advancements in sensor-based weed control systems have rendered the latter a realistic prospect, which demands detailed analyses, especially under suboptimal field conditions. The present study analysed six robotic-assisted weed control systems (RAWS) in three experiments on sugar beets in 2024, conducted under dry soil and high weed pressure. The experiments included sensor-based inter-row and intra-row hoeing, spot- and band-spraying and were compared to a broadcast herbicide treatment and an untreated control. Weed control efficacy (WCE) in the intra- and inter-row areas, as well as weed species composition and crop plant damage, were assessed after treatment. The data show that intra-row WCE of two hoeing robots (Farming GT® and Robovator®) equipped with selective intra-row blades achieved up to 80%, which was higher than the broadcast herbicide control with 67% WCE. In the inter-row area, Farming GT® robotic hoeing and ARA® spot-spraying resulted in more than 90% WCE, which was equal to the broadcast herbicide application. Weed species composition was not affected by the different RAWS. Crop plants were affected by all hoeing treatments with maximum non-lethal burial rates of 33%. The highest lethal uprooting of crop plants occurred after Farming GT® robotic hoeing, at 5.5% overall. The results demonstrate the great potential of robotic weeding to replace broadcast herbicide applications.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40106 - Agronomy, plant breeding and plant protection; (Agricultural biotechnology to be 4.4)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Plant, Soil and Environment

  • ISSN

    1214-1178

  • e-ISSN

    1805-9368

  • Volume of the periodical

    71

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    11

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    782-792

  • UT code for WoS article

    001627300300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105024417972