All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Evaluating the mitigation effectiveness of forests managed for conservation versus commodity production using an Australian example

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F22%3A92998" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/22:92998 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/conl.12878" target="_blank" >https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/conl.12878</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12878" target="_blank" >10.1111/conl.12878</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Evaluating the mitigation effectiveness of forests managed for conservation versus commodity production using an Australian example

  • Original language description

    Forests are critical for biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation: reducing emissions, increasing removals, and providing resilient ecosystems with stable long-term carbon storage. However, evaluating the mitigation effectiveness of forests managed for conservation versus commodity production has been long debated. We assessed factors influencing evaluation of mitigation effectiveness--land area, time horizon, reference level, carbon stock longevity--and tested the outcomes using analyses of carbon dynamics from an Australian ecosystem. Results showed that landscape scale accounting using carbon carrying capacity as the reference level and assessed over a series of time horizons best enables explicit evaluation of mitigation benefits. Time horizons need to differentiate between near-term emissions reduction targets (2030 and 2050), relative longevity of carbon stocks in different reservoirs, and long-term impacts on atmospheric CO2 concentration. Greatest mitigation benefits derive fro

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10619 - Biodiversity conservation

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Conservation Letters

  • ISSN

    1755-263X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    15

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    1-11

  • UT code for WoS article

    000760269300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85125947276