All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

SPRUCE- AND BEECH-DOMINATED PRIMARY FORESTS IN THE WESTERN CARPATHIANS DIFFER IN TERMS OF FOREST STRUCTURE AND BIRD ASSEMBLAGES, INDEPENDENTLY OF DISTURBANCE REGIMES

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F23%3A97151" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/23:97151 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23361964.2023.6" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23361964.2023.6</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/23361964.2023.6" target="_blank" >10.14712/23361964.2023.6</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    SPRUCE- AND BEECH-DOMINATED PRIMARY FORESTS IN THE WESTERN CARPATHIANS DIFFER IN TERMS OF FOREST STRUCTURE AND BIRD ASSEMBLAGES, INDEPENDENTLY OF DISTURBANCE REGIMES

  • Original language description

    Mountain spruce- and beech-dominated forests (SDPF and BDPF) are of major importance in temperate Europe. However, information on the differences between their historical disturbance regimes, structures, and biodiversity is still incomplete. To address this knowledge gap, we established 118 circular research plots across 18 primary forest stands. We analysed the disturbance history of the last 250 years by dendrochronological methods and calculated disturbance frequency, severity, and timing. We also measured forest structure (DBH, tree density, volume of deadwood, and other parameters). Breeding bird populations were examined by point count method during the spring seasons 2017-2018 (SDPF) and 2019-2020 (BDPF). Using direct ordination analysis, we compared the disturbance history, structure and bird assemblage in both forest types. While no differences were found regarding disturbance regimes between forest types, forest structure and bird assemblages were significantly different. SDPF had a significantly higher density of cavities and higher canopy openness, while higher tree species richness and more intense regeneration was found in BDPF. Bird assemblage showed higher species richness in BDPF, but lower total abundance. Most bird species which occurred in both forest types were more numerous in spruce-dominated forests, but more species occurred exclusively in BDPF. Further, some SDPF- preferring species were found in naturally disturbed patches in BDPF. We conclude that although natural disturbances are important drivers of primary forest structures, differences in the bird assemblages in the explored primary forest types were largely independent of disturbance regimes.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10619 - Biodiversity conservation

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European Journal of Environmental Sciences

  • ISSN

    1805-0174

  • e-ISSN

    1805-0174

  • Volume of the periodical

    13

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    47-59

  • UT code for WoS article

    001024100400006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85168804600