All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Inherent relationship of the USLE, RUSLE topographic factor algorithms and its impact on soil erosion modelling

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F20%3A81940" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/20:81940 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02626667.2020.1784423" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02626667.2020.1784423</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1784423" target="_blank" >10.1080/02626667.2020.1784423</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Inherent relationship of the USLE, RUSLE topographic factor algorithms and its impact on soil erosion modelling

  • Original language description

    The accurate representation of the Earth s surface plays a vital role in soil erosion modelling. Topography is parameterized in the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and Revised USLE (RUSLE) by the topographic (LS) factor. For slope gradients less than 20 percent, soil loss values are similar for both models, but when the gradient is increased, RUSLE estimates are only half of those of USLE. The study aims to assess the validity of this statement for complex hillslope profiles. To that end, both models were applied at eight diverse mountainous subwatersheds. The USLE and RUSLE indices were estimated utilizing the SEAGIS model and a European dataset, respectively. LS factors were in a 3 to 1 ratio (i.e. USLE to RUSLE) considering the entire basin area. For areas with slopes less than 20 percent, gross erosion estimates of both models converged. Sites of strong relief (greater than 20 percent) USLE yielded significantly higher values than RUSLE.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40104 - Soil science

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Hydrological sciences journal-journal des sciences hydrologiques

  • ISSN

    0262-6667

  • e-ISSN

    2150-3435

  • Volume of the periodical

    65

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    11

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    1879-1893

  • UT code for WoS article

    000547392100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85087690714