All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Towards 90 m resolution digital terrain model combining ICESat-2 and GEDI data: Balancing accuracy and sampling intensity

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F25%3A103010" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/25:103010 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2025.100293" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2025.100293</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2025.100293" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.srs.2025.100293</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Towards 90 m resolution digital terrain model combining ICESat-2 and GEDI data: Balancing accuracy and sampling intensity

  • Original language description

    This study employs Ice, Cloud and Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) and the Global Ecosystems Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) observations to generate gridded digital terrain models (DTMs). Specifically, we (1) compared how acquisition characteristics affect the accuracy of ICESat-2 and GEDI observations, (2) assessed the sampling intensity with respect to observation accuracy (0.25–50 m) and grid resolution (90, 300, and 1000 m), and (3) interpolated DTMs at 90 m resolution and compared their accuracy with a global digital elevation model (DEM) Copernicus GLO-90. ICESat-2 data consistently outperformed GEDI footprints in terms of terrain elevation accuracy across a range of conditions (terrain slope, landcover, beam strength, and day/night). Sampling intensity is strongly shaped by the trade-offs between observation accuracy and grid resolution, limiting the coverage at finer scales and stricter thresholds. However, combining ICESat-2 and GEDI boosted sampling intensity, with over 60 % of cells containing at least one observation, which enabled a 90 m DTMs interpolation. The spaceborne lidar DTMs at 90 m resolution achieved RMSEs between 9.9 and 14.7 m, comparable to Copernicus DEM (9.9–15.6 m). However, the local accuracy of the interpolated DTMs depended on both the number of input observations and their accuracy. Where at least 4–6 observations per a 90 m cell with vertical accuracy better than 5 m were available, spaceborne lidar DTMs outperformed the Copernicus DEM, with RMSEs of 3.7 m vs. 11.2 m in forests and 2.6 m vs. 3.1 m in non-forested areas. This demonstrates that spaceborne lidar-derived DTMs could replace global DEMs.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20705 - Remote sensing

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Science of Remote Sensing

  • ISSN

    2666-0172

  • e-ISSN

    2666-0172

  • Volume of the periodical

    12

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    100293

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    001600190500001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105020425483