All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Unravelling Bias: A Sardinian perspective on taxonomic, spatial, and temporal biases in vascular plant biodiversity data from GBIF

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F25%3A103611" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41330/25:103611 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103289" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103289</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103289" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103289</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Unravelling Bias: A Sardinian perspective on taxonomic, spatial, and temporal biases in vascular plant biodiversity data from GBIF

  • Original language description

    Biodiversity data are expanding rapidly, yet often exhibit significant biases that are rarely mapped or systematically analyzed to understand underlying drivers. This issue is particularly pressing in the era of citizen science, which now contributes a substantial share of biodiversity records. In this study, we assessed taxonomic, temporal, and spatial biases in vascular plant occurrence records from Sardinia, a Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot, using all available occurrence data for the region retrieved from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). The dataset encompasses a range of sources, from structured inventories to citizen science platforms. Biases were quantified using metrics such as species richness completeness, Pielou's evenness, and the Nearest Neighbor Index (NNI). After mapping these biases, we used Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) to explore their environmental drivers, including road density, the standard deviation of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and topographic roughness. Additionally, we evaluated the influence of structured data sources (e.g., Wikiplantbase) versus citizen science platforms (e.g., PlantNet and iNaturalist) on observed bias patterns. Spatial bias was the most prominent, followed by temporal and taxonomic biases. Road density and NDVI influenced both temporal and taxonomic biases, while topographic roughness affected temporal and spatial biases. Structured data mainly contributed to temporal bias, whereas citizen science data were more associated with spatial bias. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing biases in biodiversity data, particularly those introduced by citizen science, and provide a replicable framework for improving data quality and biodiversity monitoring at both sampling and interpretation stage.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Ecological Informatics

  • ISSN

    1574-9541

  • e-ISSN

    1574-9541

  • Volume of the periodical

    90

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    DEC 2025

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    001538993300002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105009615121