All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENTLY PREPARED GLASS SURFACES - THE COMPARISON BETWEEN EDX AND XRF

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22310%2F22%3A43925877" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22310/22:43925877 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.ceramics-silikaty.cz/index.php?page=cs_detail_doi&id=1588" target="_blank" >https://www.ceramics-silikaty.cz/index.php?page=cs_detail_doi&id=1588</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13168/cs.2022.0038" target="_blank" >10.13168/cs.2022.0038</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENTLY PREPARED GLASS SURFACES - THE COMPARISON BETWEEN EDX AND XRF

  • Original language description

    Two sets of model glasses differing by molar fractions of bridging (BO) and non-bridging (NBO) oxygens and of Q3and Q4structural units were prepared. Glasses in each set are isostructural on BO/NBO level that means the fractions of BO and NBO are the same. The groups mimic Float glass and the commercial barium crystal glass. The study compares three different ways of glass surface preparation in order to find the most realistic results of chemical analyses. The studied surfaces were: i) the original surface created by melting and exposed to the ambient atmosphere, ii) polished sample routinely prepared in way common for X-ray microanalysis, and iii) freshly fractured surface. Glasses were also analysed by XRF and the results were compared with the EDX analysis. The data suggest the EDX analysis of fresh fractures provide the most realistic composition. The comparison of XRF and EDX provide useful insight into the differences between two methods and further enhances the complexity of the glass surface study. While XRF offers a reliable analysis of bigger volume and provides averaged composition, EDX yields a more realistic surface and local composition. EDX of freshly prepared fractures revealed strong sodium enrichment on the surface due to the active participation of this element in the relaxation of the newly formed surface. © 2022 University of Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Environmental Technology. All rights reserved.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20504 - Ceramics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/LTT20001" target="_blank" >LTT20001: Surfaces of silicate glass; characterization, structure, and modification. Cooperation with Centre of excellence FunGlass.</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Ceramics-Silikáty

  • ISSN

    0862-5468

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    66

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    428-435

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85139081156