All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Ecological risk source distribution, uncertainty analysis, and application of geographically weighted regression cokriging for prediction of potentially toxic elements in agricultural soils

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22320%2F22%3A43925373" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22320/22:43925373 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/60460709:41210/22:92287

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/process-safety-and-environmental-protection/vol/164/suppl/C" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/process-safety-and-environmental-protection/vol/164/suppl/C</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.06.051" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.psep.2022.06.051</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Ecological risk source distribution, uncertainty analysis, and application of geographically weighted regression cokriging for prediction of potentially toxic elements in agricultural soils

  • Original language description

    A resilient environment is essential for society&apos;s long-term viability. Receptor models have evolved into an excellent tool for detecting pollution sources and evaluating each source&apos;s empirical contributions based on ecological datasets. One hundred and fifteen soil sample were collected from the district of Frydek Mistek in the Czech Republic and the concentration of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb)and zinc (Zn) measured inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry. The results suggested that the hybridized receptor models ER-PMF and PMF identified the following geogenic, steel industries, vehicular traffic, and agro-based activities such as pesticide and fertilizer applications as the primary sources in the source distribution. The ER-PMF source pollution identification efficiency ranged from R2 0.872–0.970, RMSE 0.128–17.344 and MAE 0.085–10.388, whereas the PMF R2 ranged from 0.883 to 0.960, RMSE 0.246–79.003 and MAE 0.145–49.925. The overall assessment of the efficiency of the receptor models suggests that the ER-PMF appears to yield more efficient results in pollution source identification compared to PMF. The PTEs mapping using geographical weighted regression (GWR) and a hybridized regression approach, geographical weighted regression cokriging (GWRCoK), revealed that GWRCoK had a higher goodness of fit in the spatial prediction maps than GWR. According to Hakanson&apos;s risk index classification, the ecological risk level in the study area was moderate to high (risk level = 51 observed locations out of 115, or 44.35%); however, Chen&apos;s risk index reclassification indicated that the toxicity level in the study area was moderate to extremely high (risk level = 113 observed locations out of 115, or 98.26%). However, the uncertainty assessment results indicated that the DISP interval ratio of the hybridized ER-PMF model was lower than that of the parent PMF model. However, it was clear that the random error that could occur in the DISP based on the DISP interval ratio was likely to be lower in the ER-PMF receptor model than in the parent model. The assessment of PTEs in soil has been widely published, but this study recommends using a pollution assessment-based receptor model (ER-PMF), which has been shown to be reliable and practical in estimating distribution sources. © 2022 The Institution of Chemical Engineers

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F0000845" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000845: Centre for investigation of synthesis and transformation of nutritional substances in the food chain in interaction with potentially harmful substances of athropogenic origin: assessment of contamination risks for the quality of production</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Process Safety and Environmental Protection

  • ISSN

    0957-5820

  • e-ISSN

    1744-3598

  • Volume of the periodical

    164

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    August 2022

  • Country of publishing house

    SG - SINGAPORE

  • Number of pages

    18

  • Pages from-to

    729-746

  • UT code for WoS article

    000827289300002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85133253544