All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Test of the Duh-Haymet-Henderson theory for mixtures: cavity correlation functions and excess volumes

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22340%2F19%3A43918360" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22340/19:43918360 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00268976.2019.1656348?needAccess=true" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00268976.2019.1656348?needAccess=true</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2019.1656348" target="_blank" >10.1080/00268976.2019.1656348</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Test of the Duh-Haymet-Henderson theory for mixtures: cavity correlation functions and excess volumes

  • Original language description

    The accuracy of the Duh-Haymet-Henderson (DHH) integral equation theory for predicting the cavity correlation functions of mixtures has been tested by comparison with molecular simulations. We have compared the cavity correlation functions, internal energies, and pressures computed for Lennard-Jones model mixtures of Ar/Kr, Ar/Ne, and Ar/Xe with these same quantities computed from the DHH theory and also, for reference, the Percus-Yevick (PY) integral equation theory. We found that DHH gave much better accuracy than PY at high densities. At low densities DHH and PY give essentially identical predictions. We have computed excess volumes for Ar/Kr mixtures at two pressures (10 and 20 MPa) at 132.32 K, for which experimentally derived data are available. The DHH theory predicts the correct trends and is quantitatively more accurate than the PY theory for predicting the excess volumes. We have tested the local optimality of the DHH theory for pure fluids by adding two adjustable parameters to the DHH bridge function expression to see if it is possible to improve the DHH predictions of the cavity correlation function empirically, holding the form of the bridge function constant. We found that no single set of adjustable parameter values could improve the accuracy of DHH over multiple different isotherms. Furthermore, perturbing DHH leads to a decrease in accuracy of the predictions of both the pressure and energy, although small improvements in the cavity correlation functions were achieved. Thus, the DHH theory is locally optimal, given the form of the bridge function. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10403 - Physical chemistry

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Molecular Physics

  • ISSN

    0026-8976

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    117

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    23-24

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    3623-3631

  • UT code for WoS article

    000483265500001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85071033113