Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study)
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61383082%3A_____%2F19%3A00001676" target="_blank" >RIV/61383082:_____/19:00001676 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31654188/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31654188/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04464-2" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00417-019-04464-2</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study)
Original language description
Purpose: To describe the natural history of diabetic macular edema (DME) with respect to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) outcomes and to identify baseline patient characteristics and systemic factors associated with improvement or worsening of outcomes in sham-treated patients. Methods: The study population was sham-treated patients (n = 350) in the 3-year MEAD registration study of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of DME. Patients had center-involved DME and received sham intravitreal injections in the study eye at ≥ 6-month intervals. Potential prognostic factors for outcomes were evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Visual and anatomic outcomes were poorer in patients who left the study early (n = 198) than in study completers (n = 152). Mean change in BCVA from baseline at the last visit with available data was + 0.9 letters; 37.5% of patients had no change in BCVA, 23.2% had gained > 10 letters, and 16.0% had lost > 10 letters. Older age and baseline diabetic retinopathy score > 6 were associated with worse BCVA outcomes; thicker baseline CRT and larger number of hypertension medications used were associated with larger reductions in CRT during the study. Conclusions: BCVA and CRT outcomes were variable in this population of DME patients with generally good glycemic control. In DME patients without active treatment, older age and baseline diabetic retinopathy score > 6 were associated with less improvement in BCVA; thicker baseline CRT and a larger number of antihypertensive medications used predicted better improvement in CRT. Trial registration: The MEAD study trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifiers NCT00168337 and NCT00168389.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30207 - Ophthalmology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
ISSN
0721-832X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
257
Issue of the periodical within the volume
12
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
2639-2653
UT code for WoS article
000492583600002
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85074582448