All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study)

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61383082%3A_____%2F19%3A00001676" target="_blank" >RIV/61383082:_____/19:00001676 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31654188/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31654188/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04464-2" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00417-019-04464-2</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Natural history of diabetic macular edema and factors predicting outcomes in sham-treated patients (MEAD study)

  • Original language description

    Purpose: To describe the natural history of diabetic macular edema (DME) with respect to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) outcomes and to identify baseline patient characteristics and systemic factors associated with improvement or worsening of outcomes in sham-treated patients. Methods: The study population was sham-treated patients (n = 350) in the 3-year MEAD registration study of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of DME. Patients had center-involved DME and received sham intravitreal injections in the study eye at ≥ 6-month intervals. Potential prognostic factors for outcomes were evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Visual and anatomic outcomes were poorer in patients who left the study early (n = 198) than in study completers (n = 152). Mean change in BCVA from baseline at the last visit with available data was + 0.9 letters; 37.5% of patients had no change in BCVA, 23.2% had gained > 10 letters, and 16.0% had lost > 10 letters. Older age and baseline diabetic retinopathy score > 6 were associated with worse BCVA outcomes; thicker baseline CRT and larger number of hypertension medications used were associated with larger reductions in CRT during the study. Conclusions: BCVA and CRT outcomes were variable in this population of DME patients with generally good glycemic control. In DME patients without active treatment, older age and baseline diabetic retinopathy score > 6 were associated with less improvement in BCVA; thicker baseline CRT and a larger number of antihypertensive medications used predicted better improvement in CRT. Trial registration: The MEAD study trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifiers NCT00168337 and NCT00168389.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30207 - Ophthalmology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

  • ISSN

    0721-832X

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    257

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    12

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    2639-2653

  • UT code for WoS article

    000492583600002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85074582448