All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium‑coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single‑centre randomised study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61383082%3A_____%2F23%3A00001304" target="_blank" >RIV/61383082:_____/23:00001304 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37737497/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37737497/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07947-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00586-023-07947-3</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium‑coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single‑centre randomised study

  • Original language description

    Background: A comparison of fusion rates and clinical outcomes of instrumented transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) between polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium-coated PEEK (Ti-PEEK) cages is not well documented. Methods: A single-centre, prospective, randomised study included patients who underwent one-level TLIF between L3-S1 segments. Patients were randomised into one of two groups: TLIF surgery with the PEEK cage and TLIF surgery with the Ti-PEEK cage. Clinical results were measured. All patients were assessed by repeated X-rays and 3D CT scans. Cage integration was assessed using a modified Bridwell classification. The impact of obesity and smoking on fusion quality was also analysed. Patients in both groups were followed up for 2 years. Results: Altogether 87 patients were included in the study: of these 87 patients, 81 (93.1%) completed the 2-year follow-up. A significant improvement in clinical outcome was found in the two measurements scales in both groups (RM: p = 0.257, VAS: p = 0.229). There was an increase in CobbS and CobbL angle in both groups (p = 0.172 for CobbS and p = 0.403for CobbL). Bony fusion was achieved in 37 of 40 (92.5%) patients in the TiPEEK group and 35 of 41 (85.4%) in the PEEK group (p = 0.157). Cage subsided in 2 of 40 patients (5%) in the TiPEEK group and 11 of 41 (26.8%) in the PEEK group (p = 0.007). Body mass index > 30 and smoking were not predictive factors of bony fusion achievement. Conclusion: There is no significant advantage of TiPEEK cages over PEEK cages in clinical outcome and fusion rate 2 years after surgery.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European Spine Journal

  • ISSN

    0940-6719

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    2023

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    Sept

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    1-7

  • UT code for WoS article

    001071707900003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database