All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The impact of ERAS protocols on postoperative outcomes in robotic, laparoscopic, and open colorectal surgery: A multicenter retrospective study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61383082%3A_____%2F25%3A00001571" target="_blank" >RIV/61383082:_____/25:00001571 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41207157/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41207157/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116679" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116679</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The impact of ERAS protocols on postoperative outcomes in robotic, laparoscopic, and open colorectal surgery: A multicenter retrospective study

  • Original language description

    Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols improve outcomes in colorectal surgery, but the impact of ERAS on comparative effectiveness across robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches is unclear. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 5503 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery from 13 centers could be included. Patients were compared regarding surgical technique and ERAS adherence. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage; secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS) and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Multivariate regression assessed ERAS impact. Results: ERAS was used in 890 patients and associated with significantly shorter LOS across all modalities (robotic: 5.5 vs. 8.5 days; laparoscopic: 8.5 vs. 9.0 days; open: 13.1 vs. 14.5 days; p ?≤ ?0.02). ERAS independently reduced complication rates (p ?= ?0.016) and anastomotic leaks (p ?= ?0.007). Robotic surgery was protective against complications and linked to the greatest LOS reduction. ERAS did not significantly affect CCI. Conclusions: ERAS protocols improve postoperative outcomes across colorectal surgical techniques, with the greatest benefits in robotic surgery, supporting their broad clinical implementation.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30212 - Surgery

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    American Journal of Surgery

  • ISSN

    0002-9610

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    2025

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    NOV

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    1-7

  • UT code for WoS article

    001617931300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105021016709