Rethinking lumbar puncture safety: pathophysiology, diagnostic uncertainty, and research gaps in herniation risk
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61383082%3A_____%2F25%3A00001577" target="_blank" >RIV/61383082:_____/25:00001577 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40804214/" target="_blank" >https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40804214/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02866-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s13760-025-02866-0</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Rethinking lumbar puncture safety: pathophysiology, diagnostic uncertainty, and research gaps in herniation risk
Original language description
Lumbar puncture (LP) is a key diagnostic and therapeutic tool, yet concerns persist about its potential to induce brain herniation, especially in patients with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Despite ongoing debate, precise risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. Objective: This systematic review aims to examine the risk of cerebellar and paradoxical brain herniation following LP, evaluate the current evidence regarding its incidence, and discuss the implications for clinical practice as well as show the gaps in research. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed (MEDLINE) database. Studies from 1990 to 2024 focusing on bacterial meningitis, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, post-surgical states, and other conditions associated with elevated ICP were included. Results: LP-related herniation was reported in diverse clinical settings, with cerebellar herniation primarily seen in bacterial meningitis and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Herniation onset varied from minutes to days post-LP. While cranial CT is widely used for risk assessment, its predictive accuracy is debated. Conclusions: Although LP is relatively safe, herniation risk is highly context-dependent. Clinicians should integrate clinical, radiological, and pathophysiological factors in decision-making. Further research is needed to refine predictive models and establish evidence-based guidelines for high-risk patients.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Acta Neurologica Belgica
ISSN
0300-9009
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
2025
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Aug 2025
Country of publishing house
BE - BELGIUM
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
1-12
UT code for WoS article
001549118000001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105013339543