All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Quantifying the Impact of the Peptide Identification Framework on the Results of Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Protein Analysis

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61388971%3A_____%2F24%3A00585513" target="_blank" >RIV/61388971:_____/24:00585513 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/61388971:_____/23:00583029 RIV/00216208:11310/23:10473381

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00390" target="_blank" >https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00390</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00390" target="_blank" >10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00390</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Quantifying the Impact of the Peptide Identification Framework on the Results of Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Protein Analysis

  • Original language description

    Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins (FPOP) is a promising technique for studying protein structure and dynamics. The quality of insight provided by FPOP depends on the reliability of the determination of the modification site. This study investigates the performance of two search engines, Mascot and PEAKS, for the data processing of FPOP analyses. Comparison of Mascot and PEAKS of the hemoglobin--haptoglobin Bruker timsTOF data set (PXD021621) revealed greater consistency in the Mascot identification of modified peptides, with around 26% of the IDs being mutual for all three replicates, compared to approximately 22% for PEAKS. The intersection between Mascot and PEAKS results revealed a limited number (31%) of shared modified peptides. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using the peptide-spectrum match (PSM) score, site probability, and peptide intensity was applied to evaluate the results, and the analyses revealed distinct clusters of modified peptides. Mascot showed the ability to assess confident site determination, even with lower PSM scores. However, high PSM scores from PEAKS did not guarantee a reliable determination of the modification site. Fragmentation coverage of the modification position played a crucial role in Mascot assignments, while the AScore localizations from PEAKS often become ambiguous because the software employs MS/MS merging.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10606 - Microbiology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Proteome Research

  • ISSN

    1535-3893

  • e-ISSN

    1535-3907

  • Volume of the periodical

    23

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    609-617

  • UT code for WoS article

    001157569300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85181560169