Assessing the methodological quality of clinical guidelines for preventing falls of patients
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F16%3AA1701JKK" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/16:A1701JKK - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Assessing the methodological quality of clinical guidelines for preventing falls of patients
Original language description
Aim: The study aimed to assess the methodological quality of selected clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for preventing riskof falling in adult patients in acute and long-term institutional care. Design: Descriptive study using qualitative researchtechniques. Methods: CPGs were systematically searched in databases of clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, electronicdatabases, and websites of organizations and professional societies, based on predefined criteria and keywords fo the period2000?2015. After sorting and analysing 53 documents, the methodological quality of seven selected CPGs were assessed withthe AGREE II generic instrument. Results: All CPGs obtained highest domain scores in the dimensions Clarity andFramework, and Purpose, while the lowest standardized scores were achieved by the Applicability and Editorial independencedomains. The Rigor of development and Stakeholder Involvement domains achieved an average score. A total of threerecommended guidelines showed high methodological quality: Falls. Assessment and prevention of falls in older people ? 572b., 84 % (NICE, 2013); Preventing Falls and Harm From Falls in Older People. Best Practice Guidelines for AustralianHospitals ? 556 b., 84 % (ACSQHC, 2009); and Prevention of falls and fall injuries in the older adult ? 559 b., 82 % (RNAO,2005). Conclusion: Assessing the methodological quality of clinical guidelines using the AGREE instrument is one of the keysteps in the process of their adaptation for other socio-cultural and organizational conditions. It would be possible to adapt anduse all of the three most highly-rated CPGs to reduce risk of falling of inpatients in the Czech organizational and socio-culturalcontext
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
AQ - Safety and health protection, safety in operating machinery
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/NT14502" target="_blank" >NT14502: Development and implementation of a clinical practice guideline for falls prevention of hospitalized patients</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery
ISSN
2336-3517
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
7
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
549-557
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—