Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: A double-blind, randomized, single-center trial
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F17%3AA1701M1N" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/17:A1701M1N - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00023761:_____/17:N0000003
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27845950" target="_blank" >https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27845950</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000791" target="_blank" >10.1097/MEG.0000000000000791</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: A double-blind, randomized, single-center trial
Original language description
Objective Bowel distension by insufflated air causes abdominal discomfort after colonoscopy. Carbon dioxide (CO 2) instead of air insufflation during colonoscopy can reduce postprocedural discomfort in diagnostic and screening cases. Discomfort after colonoscopy and CO 2 insufflation have never been studied in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, characterized by younger age, structural changes of the colon, and need for repeated and frequently uncomfortable colonoscopies. Our trial was designed to evaluate postprocedural discomfort associated with CO 2 compared with air insufflation in unsedated or minimally sedated patients with known IBD. Methods In a double-blind, randomized, single-center study, 64 patients were randomized to either CO 2 insufflation (CO 2) or air insufflation colonoscopy (Air). Abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence scores during 24 h after colonoscopy were recorded using a continuous scale of 0-10 (0=none, 10=maximum discomfort). The primary endpoint used for power calculation was bloating score at 1 h after colonoscopy. Results Pain, bloating, and flatulence scores at end, 1, and 3 h after colonoscopy were significantly lower in CO 2 than in Air arm (P<0.001). Scores at 6, 12, and 24 h were comparable. Procedural parameters such as cecal and terminal ileum intubation rate, intubation and total time, pain during insertion, need for repositioning, and abdominal compression were not different between arms. No complications were recorded in the study. Conclusion Compared with air, CO 2 insufflation significantly reduces abdominal pain, bloating, and flatulence scores during at least 3 h after colonoscopy in IBD patients, achieving comparable intraprocedural outcomes. Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30219 - Gastroenterology and hepatology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT
ISSN
0954-691X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
29
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
5
Pages from-to
355-359
UT code for WoS article
000393773100018
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84995466957