All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Autologous transplant vs oral chemotherapy and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed young myeloma patients: a pooled analysis

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F17%3AA1801RYM" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/17:A1801RYM - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00843989:_____/17:E0106575

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.381" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.381</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.381" target="_blank" >10.1038/leu.2016.381</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Autologous transplant vs oral chemotherapy and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed young myeloma patients: a pooled analysis

  • Original language description

    In newly diagnosed myeloma patients, upfront autologous transplant (ASCT) prolongs progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) compared with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide (CC+R). Salvage ASCT at first relapse may still effectively rescue patients who did not receive upfront ASCT. To evaluate the long-term benefit of upfront ASCT vs CC+R and the impact of salvage ASCT in patients who received upfront CC+R, we conducted a pooled analysis of 2 phase III trials (RV-MM-209 and EMN-441). Primary endpoints were PFS1, progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS). A total of 268 patients were randomized to 2 courses of melphalan 200 mg/m(2) and ASCT (MEL200-ASCT) and 261 to CC+R. Median follow-up was 46 months. MEL200-ASCT significantly improved PFS1 (median: 42 vs 24 months, HR 0.53; P &lt; 0.001), PFS2 (4 years: 71 vs 54%, HR 0.53, P &lt; 0.001) and OS (4 years: 84 vs 70%, HR 0.51, P &lt; 0.001) compared with CC+R. The advantage was noticed in good and bad prognosis patients. Only 53% of patients relapsing from CC+R received ASCT at first relapse. Upfront ASCT significantly reduced the risk of death (HR 0.51; P = 0.007) in comparison with salvage ASCT. In conclusion, these data confirm the role of upfront ASCT as the standard approach for all young myeloma patients.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30205 - Hematology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    LEUKEMIA

  • ISSN

    0887-6924

  • e-ISSN

    1476-5551

  • Volume of the periodical

    31

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    1727-1734

  • UT code for WoS article

    000406781900008

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85010892441