Prevention of esophageal strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17110%2F18%3AA1901VYS" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17110/18:A1901VYS - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00216208:11110/18:10380161 RIV/00216208:11130/18:10380161 RIV/00023001:_____/18:00077438 RIV/61383082:_____/18:00000443 RIV/67985904:_____/18:00506486

Result on the web

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07751-9" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07751-9</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07751-9" target="_blank" >10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07751-9</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Prevention of esophageal strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection

Original language description

Endoscopic submucosal dissection or widespread endoscopic resection allow the radical removal of circumferential or near-circumferential neoplastic esophageal lesions. The advantage of these endoscopic methods is mini-invasivity and low risk of major adverse events compared to traditional esophagectomy. The major drawback of these extensive resections is the development of stricture - the risk is 70-80% if more than 75% of the circumference is removed and almost 100% if the whole circumference is removed. Thus, an effective method to prevent post-ER/ESD esophageal stricture would be of major benefit, because treatment of strictures requires multiple sessions of endoscopic dilatation and may carry a risk of perforation. Moreover, not all strictures are easy to treat and some patients may develop refractory strictures. There are several techniques and methods, which have been tested in both experimental and/or clinical studies but no one has received general acceptance based on results of high-quality evidence. The studies are usually small with a limited number of patients, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials and some techniques have been described only in experimental studies. Thus, prevention of post-ESD strictures remains an unresolved issue. On the other hand, because of the high risk of stricture and partially proven effectiveness of some preventive techniques, a preventive strategy should be considered in patients undergoing extensive ER/ESD in the esophagus. There is, however, no evidence about the superiority or inferiority of a particular preventive strategy compared to other techniques, moreover, there is paucity of data assessing the effectiveness of the combination of different preventive methods. The best preventive strategies known so far include 1) oral or local administration of corticosteroids; and 2) preventive stenting.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30212 - Surgery

Project

Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

Continuities

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Publication year

2018

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

MINERVA CHIRURGICA

ISSN

0026-4733

e-ISSN

1827-1626

Volume of the periodical

73

Issue of the periodical within the volume

4

Country of publishing house

IT - ITALY

Number of pages

16

Pages from-to

394-409

UT code for WoS article

000445223700006

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85051121742